The activist and former presidential candidate was remanded following court proceedings linked to statements he allegedly made about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The case centers on remarks in which Sowore referred to the President as a "criminal," a statement that subsequently became the subject of legal action.
During the proceedings, the Federal High Court directed that Sowore be held at the Kuje Correctional Centre pending further hearings in the matter. The court's decision followed arguments presented by the parties involved in the case, which is expected to continue at a later date.
Speaking shortly after the court session during an interview on TVC News on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, Sowore recounted what transpired as correctional officials prepared to transport him from the court premises to the correctional facility.
According to him, he objected to the instruction that he should board a Black Maria, a vehicle commonly used for conveying inmates and detainees. Sowore explained that he questioned the rationale behind the decision, arguing that his situation differed significantly from that of individuals accused of financial crimes.
Describing the encounter, he said he challenged the officials over the mode of transportation being used. In his words, "When you are sending people who stole billions to prison you put them in a van, why do you want to put me in Black Maria."
The AAC presidential candidate maintained that his case stemmed from political expression and activism rather than allegations of financial wrongdoing. He argued that being transported in a Black Maria was inconsistent with the treatment he claimed was often extended to individuals facing charges related to large-scale financial misconduct.
Sowore further stated that he questioned the correctional authorities over what he viewed as unequal treatment, insisting that the circumstances surrounding his legal challenge should have warranted a different approach.
The remand order has drawn public attention, particularly because of Sowore's prominence as a political figure and activist known for his outspoken criticism of government policies and public office holders.
Over the years, he has remained one of Nigeria's most vocal advocates for political reform and accountability, often engaging in public campaigns and protests on issues of governance and social justice.
His latest legal challenge has added another chapter to his long-running confrontations with state institutions. Supporters of the activist have argued that the case touches on broader questions relating to freedom of expression, while critics contend that public statements made by political figures should remain within the bounds of the law.
0 Comments