According to a report by Daily Post, on Friday, February 13, 2026, the prominent human rights defender and political activist Omoyele Sowore has firmly declared his refusal to participate in any collaborative opposition front that includes certain high-profile political figures from the previous administration.
Sowore singled out the former governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, and the erstwhile attorney-general of the federation, Abubakar Malami, as individuals with whom he shares no political common ground.
During a detailed conversation on News Central, the activist articulated a stern position against the formation of alliances for the mere sake of political convenience, suggesting that such mergers often lack the moral foundation necessary to bring about genuine change in the Nigerian landscape.
Sowore’s commentary arrived amidst a broader national dialogue concerning the necessity for comprehensive electoral reforms and the demand for increased transparency as the 2027 general elections draw closer.
The individuals currently attempting to position themselves as leaders of a new opposition movement are the very same actors responsible for the socioeconomic and systemic stagnation that has gripped the country in recent times.
He argued that these figures played central roles in policies and actions that effectively brought Nigeria to a standstill, making their sudden pivot toward opposition politics appear disingenuous to those who have remained consistent in their struggle for better governance.
Throughout the interview, Sowore maintained a tone of conviction, emphasising that political integrity cannot be sacrificed for the sake of numbers.
He said, “You can’t see me in opposition with a Babachir Lawal, El-Rufai or a Malami. These are guys that were killing this country as recently as two years ago.”
This specific assertion underscores his belief that the recent history of these politicians is too detrimental to be overlooked.
He views their past contributions to the governance of the country as inherently destructive, suggesting that their involvement in any reformist movement would fundamentally compromise the credibility of that movement.
Furthermore, Sowore did not reserve his critiques solely for those from the older political guard.
He extended his scrutiny toward more contemporary figures and parties, questioning the efficacy and character of the Labour Party’s recent political gains.
He raised pointed questions regarding the current whereabouts and legislative impact of the senators and House of Representatives members who were elected under the Labour Party banner during the last cycle.
By challenging the narrative put forward by Peter Obi and others who championed the Labour Party as a sanctuary for politicians of high calibre, Sowore highlighted what he perceives as a gap between political rhetoric and actual governance.
Sowore reiterated that his stance is rooted in a deep-seated knowledge of the Nigerian political class.
He noted that his refusal to join such coalitions is not a matter of stubbornness but a categorical rejection of a recycled political culture.
He insisted that he understands the motivations and histories of these individuals far too well to believe that a coalition featuring them could offer any meaningful alternative to the status quo.
For Sowore, the path to 2027 must be paved with ideological clarity rather than the desperate merging of disparate political interests that once held the reins of power during the nation's most difficult periods.
0 Comments