In a recent interview on Arise TV, on Tuesday, June 9, 2026, Dr. Sam Amadi, Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thought, discussed the strategic calculations that could shape the opposition’s preparations for the 2027 presidential election.
The conversation focused on the search for a viable vice-presidential candidate, the electoral challenges facing opposition parties, and the political realities that may influence the outcome of the next general election.
Amadi argued that choosing a running mate is one of the most critical decisions any presidential candidate can make.
According to him, beyond experience and public visibility, candidates must consider regional influence, political networks, and the ability of a potential running mate to withstand intense political competition in key battleground areas.
He claimed the presiding judge became upset and instructed his lawyer to kneel in open court. Describing the incident as unusual, Sowore said, “So that was the weirdest thing I've ever seen in a courtroom in Nigeria.”
The activist further stated that his team subsequently petitioned the Chief Judge, arguing that the court no longer appeared capable of delivering justice.
According to Sowore, the request did not halt proceedings, prompting his lawyers to step aside.
He said, “My lawyer said they can't continue and I opted to go before him to represent myself,” while seeking a fresh legal team and requesting the judge’s recusal.
When asked whether he regretted describing the president as a criminal, Sowore responded, “Oh, not at all.”
Addressing concerns that the remarks could affect his political ambitions or lead to imprisonment, he stated, “I'm not afraid of going to jail.”
He added, “I'm not going to jail as a criminal. I'm going to jail because of my convictions. Those are two different things.”
“Comment on Tinubu: I am not Afraid of going to jail,” remained the central theme of Sowore’s remarks as he maintained confidence in his legal position.
He insisted that he would seek to prove his claims before what he described as a fair court.
“If we find a judge that's fair and fearless, we'll prove it in court that what I said it's true,” he said, while arguing that truth remains a valid defence in defamation proceedings.
0 Comments